I've updated the Impulse From March 2009 page and the Zig Zag From March 2009 page.
On each I've shown some potential levels to watch out for.
I've also addressed (on the Zig Zag page) an issue I keep coming back to - if we're in primary wave [3] down from 1219.80, whether I should be labelling the decline on the basis that we have completed minor wave 1 of intermediate (3) of primary [3]. My labelling assumes that we are still in minor wave 1. Obviously, I can't be certain that this is correct, but I've explained why it could be.
